Regarding re-employment after retirement, in a trial that was contested whether or not it was unreasonable to scale back the essential wage to half or much less although the content material of the work was the identical as earlier than retirement, the Supreme Court stated, “Whether it’s unreasonable or not will depend on the character of the essential wage and the aim of cost. This is the primary time that the Supreme Court has dominated on the disparity in fundamental wages between common and non-regular employees.
Two males who had been workers of “Nagoya Driving School”, which has its head workplace in Nagoya City, had been doing the identical work even after being re-employed as a part-time worker after retirement, however in comparison with after they had been full-time workers.
The 1st and 2nd trials ordered the corporate to pay greater than 6 million yen, saying that it was unlawful for the essential wage to fall beneath 60% on the time of retirement although the content material of the work didn’t change, and either side appealed the judgment.