Regarding the interpretation of “political fairness” stipulated by the Broadcasting Act, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications mentioned that it was extremely probably that the reason of broadcasting to the then Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications Takaichi, which was written within the printed administrative doc, was truly finished. Minister Takaichi denied that the doc was inaccurate. The Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan and others are planning to strengthen their pursuit, saying that the distinction between the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications and Minister Takaichi has develop into clear.
Administrative paperwork launched by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications state that Minister of State for Economic Security Takaichi, who was then Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications, held discussions with executives of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications concerning the interpretation of “political fairness” stipulated by the Broadcast Law. I’m right here.
Regarding this doc, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications expressed its recognition on the House of Councilors Budget Committee on account of interviews with associated events that “there’s a excessive chance that there was a broadcasting-related minister lek”.
On the opposite hand, Minister Takaichi repeatedly denied, saying, “I confidently deny what is written in this paper. The contents of the document are inaccurate.”
The Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan and others have clarified the distinction between the views of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications and Minister Takaichi, and proceed to ask the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications to promptly make clear whether or not the contents of the reasons described are true or not. It is a coverage to strengthen the pursuit of