In the bid-rigging case wherein the previous deputy director of the organizing committee of the Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics and the previous executives of Dentsu had been arrested, the tactic of ordering work by bidding was not “for each sport” as initially envisioned, however ” According to interviews with people involved, there is a suspicion that the former deputy director and others were coordinating orders by subcontracting contractors who could not expect to receive orders at venues where multiple competitions were held. I was.
Yasuo Mori, 55, former deputy director of the Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics Organizing Committee, and Koji Hemi, 55, a former Dentsu executive and managing director of the Sports Business Bureau, were among four suspects. , Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office for suspected violation of the Anti-Monopoly Act, accusing it of illegally coordinating orders for projects totaling 40 billion yen, such as bidding for planning work for test competitions for each sport and operation work for the main competition. was arrested by
According to people involved, there is a suspicion that Deputy Director Morimoto and others have created a list of companies that will receive orders with the cooperation of Dentsu regarding the bidding for planning work for the test tournament held in 2018. is.
At first, the former deputy director considered allocating contractors for each competition, but in the end, the ordering method for work was changed from “for every competitors” to “for every venue”, and venues the place a number of competitions had been held So, it signifies that just one vendor can win the bid.
For this motive, it’s suspected that Deputy Director Morimoto and former executives Hemi and others had been coordinating orders by subcontracting a few of the firms that might not anticipate to obtain orders to the businesses that gained the bids for a similar venue. I discovered one thing new from the interview.
The Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office’s Special Investigation Department is believed to be investigating the small print of why the previous deputy director and others repeatedly made fraudulent order changes in order that contractors may undertake work in keeping with the preliminary allocation.