Former film mogul Harvey Weinstein was convicted Wednesday of one of many high fees in his intercourse crimes retrial however acquitted of one other, and jurors had been as but unable to achieve a verdict on a 3rd cost.
The break up verdict meted out a measure of vindication to his accusers and prosecutors — but additionally to Weinstein — within the landmark case.
The partial verdict got here after a unprecedented day by which the jury foreperson indicated he felt bullied and Weinstein himself urged the choose to halt the trial, declaring: “It’s just not fair.”
“My life is on the line, and you know what? It’s not fair,” the previous Hollywood heavy-hitter declared after making an uncommon request to deal with the court docket. “It’s time, it’s time, it’s time, it’s time to say this trial is over.”
Weinstein’s preliminary conviction 5 years in the past appeared to cement the downfall of one in every of Hollywood’s strongest males in a pivotal second for the #MeToo motion. But that conviction was overturned final yr, and the case was despatched again for retrial in the identical Manhattan courthouse.
This time, a majority-female jury convicted the previous studio boss of forcibly subjecting Miriam Haley, a producer and manufacturing assistant, to a felony intercourse act in 2006. Jurors acquitted Weinstein of one other felony intercourse act cost, this one associated to former mannequin Kaja Sokola’s allegations of forcible oral intercourse in 2006.
Haley, who had qualms about testifying once more, mentioned outdoors court docket Wednesday it had been “exhausting and at times dehumanizing.”
“But today’s verdict gives me hope,” she added.
Jurors had been to proceed deliberating Thursday on a rape cost involving hairstylist and actor Jessica Mann. Under New York legislation, the third-degree rape cost carries a lesser penalty than the first-degree felony intercourse act offense.
But the choose instructed the foreperson he will not must go within the jury room if he does not wish to, including extra uncertainty to the proceedings.
Weinstein, 73, denies sexually assaulting or raping anybody.
Jury-room strains began leaking into public view Friday, when a juror requested to be excused as a result of he felt one other was being handled unfairly. Then Monday, the foreperson complained that different jurors had been pushing folks to alter their minds and speaking about info past the costs.
The man raised related considerations once more Wednesday. In a closed-door dialogue with prosecutors, protection attorneys and the choose, the foreperson mentioned one other juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and at one level vowed, “You going to see me outside.”
“I feel afraid inside there,” the foreperson instructed the choose and attorneys, in keeping with a transcript.
Weinstein’s attorneys requested unsuccessfully for a mistrial every time the involved jurors got here ahead.
The trial as soon as once more turned a authorized lens — and, to some extent the general public eye — on the person whose reputed historical past of brutishness towards ladies propelled the #MeToo period that started in 2017.
Weinstein’s firms produced or distributed a string of greatest Oscar winners for many years. He personally stood on the Oscars stage as a producer of 1999 greatest image winner “Shakespeare in Love.” He additionally grew to become a distinguished Democratic donor.
When an Italian mannequin instructed police in 2015 that Weinstein had abruptly groped her in his New York workplace, no fees resulted.
Then, two years later, The New York Times and The New Yorker detailed many years of sexual harassment and sexual assault allegations in opposition to Weinstein.
Those disclosures made #MeToo a world rallying cry for sexual misconduct consciousness and accountability.
Weinstein in the end was convicted of intercourse crimes and sentenced to jail in New York and California.
His California attraction is ongoing. But New York’s highest court docket awarded Weinstein a brand new trial, saying the previous trial choose had allowed prejudicial testimony.
The retrial was expanded with new fees associated to Sokola, a Polish psychotherapist who mentioned Weinstein compelled oral intercourse on her when she was a 19-year-old mannequin.
Sokola referred to as Wednesday’s partial verdict “a big win for everyone” and the “closing of a chapter that caused me a lot of pain throughout my life.”
In one of many tensest moments of testimony, she was confronted with a passage from her non-public journal. At different flashpoints, Mann pointed indignantly at Weinstein as she walked previous him in court docket, and Haley cursed at him from the witness stand.
Weinstein’s accusers mentioned he exploited his Tinseltown affect to dangle profession assist, get them alone after which lure and drive them into sexual encounters.
In a complexity they spent days explaining, the ladies stayed in touch with Weinstein, noticed him once more, and at instances accepted or requested invites or favors, in keeping with testimony and paperwork. Mann mentioned she had a consensual relationship with Weinstein that started earlier than and continued after he allegedly raped her.
The accusers mentioned they had been making an attempt to reckon with what had occurred, making an attempt to suppress the assaults for his or her careers’ sake or making an attempt to maintain the peace with an influential, well-connected and irascible man.
Weinstein selected to not testify. His attorneys portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly attached with him to court docket alternative, then recast the encounters as crimes years later to gather settlement funds and #MeToo approbation.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This materials might not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.