“How is The Great Australian Novel going?” asks a personality in Thea Astley’s The Well Dressed Explorer, a Miles Franklin Literary Award winner in 1962.
When the weighty Cambridge History of THE AUSTRALIAN NOVEL (because the title reads on its gold cowl) landed on my doorstep I puzzled if I might discover out. Its editor, David Carter, first amongst equals as scholar-critic of Australian literature, has assembled 39 essays by leaders within the area, himself included, to chart the journey of the Australian model of this shape-shifting kind.
Review: The Cambridge History of the Australian Novel – edited by David Carter (Cambridge University Press)
I’ve learn a variety of Australian novels in my time, and written just a few. I made a decision that if I sat down and skim the historical past from cowl to cowl with open-minded curiosity, I would see what patterns emerged.
Probably no different reader would do that. The chapters on specific matters inside a versatile chronology are designed for standalone use by academics and college students. This is a modular and recursive historical past, through which the previous is revisited via a up to date lens, with an eye fixed on the long run. A grasp narrative shouldn’t be desired.
The ebook has the hallmarks of Carter’s standing as revered collaborator, mentor and assessor, and a literary critic grounded within the cultural and materials contexts of ebook manufacturing. Most of the contributors are lecturers in literary research. Their approaches mirror the tendencies of the academy in recent times.
Often they draw on analysis funded by the Australian Research Council, and the work exhibits these preferences too. For Australian literary research, which means a flip to digital humanities, notably the gathering and evaluation of knowledge to develop infrastructure of nationwide significance, such because the AustLit and Trove databases.
It means a priority with “print culture” and the broader atmosphere through which literary works are produced and acquired. It contains “the transnational turn” – how worldwide views complicate nationwide frameworks – in addition to a countermanding give attention to locatedness, notably in relation to local weather change. And it means paying heed to First Nations voices in work that passes the “national interest” check.
This is a historical past formed, or reshaped, by the fantastic introduction of literary fiction by Australian Indigenous authors, heralded by Kim Scott’s True Country (1993) and flourishing now. As Iva Polak writes from Zagreb in her essay on “Indigenous Futurism”:
I used to be studying my means via this ebook on both facet of the Voice referendum and I may sense the hope because the chapters moved in direction of the current, culminating in Eugenia Flynn’s exceptional essay “A (Sovereign) Body of Work: Australian Indigenous Literary Culture and the Literary Fiction Novel”. Flynn writes:
As a present improvement, this poses a problem to writing its historical past. The optimistic wave crashed on the planet exterior the ebook as I used to be studying – extra like a tsunami – and settler-colonialism reasserted itself with a No.
Time is usually a curveball.
Read extra: Enraged, tragic and hopeful: Alexis Wright’s new novel Praiseworthy explores Aboriginal sovereignty within the shadow of the anthropocene
An elusive literary beast
The first third of the ebook takes us from the colonial interval to mid-Twentieth-century fiction. At the midway mark, there’s a good-humoured chapter by Paul Sharrad referred to as “From Bunyip to Boom”, which summarises Australian Fiction from 1955 to 1975. Sharrad concludes that the Great Australian Novel (GAN) had by then “become an unstable narrative […] an elusive literary beast”.
Two-thirds of the best way via we attain fiction past the Mabo determination of 1992, “when the assumptions non-Aboriginal people […] held about their rights to ownership seemed no longer to be watertight”. With Andrew McGahan’s The White Earth (2004), the dialogue strikes to work printed within the twenty first century.
The current is folded right into a bending chronology that appears again to be able to mission to what’s solely simply coming. In “Uncertain Futures: Climate Fiction in Australian Literature”, Jessica White adopts the time period “future anterior”, a verb tense, as a mode for imagining near-future situations of disaster and post-catastrophe.
In different chapters, surprising juxtapositions reveal persistence throughout time. Brigid Rooney’s “Unsettling Archive: Suburbs in Australian Fiction”, for instance, locations Fiona McGregor’s Indelible Ink (2010) alongside Jessica Anderson’s The Impersonators (1980) in an overlapping map of Sydney. Paul Giles cites Alexander Harris’s Settlers and Convicts (1847) as an early case of settler unsettlement, whereas Lynda Ng takes up the identical theme in her concluding chapter on J.M. Coetzee, Behrouz Boochani and “the disquiet generated historically” by each Aboriginal folks and non-Anglo migrants “in settler Australian culture”.
A tense sense of “future anterior” runs via this collective historical past, as writers establish tendencies within the current which will or could not prefigure an alternate potential forward. In his introduction, Carter refers to “the imagining into being an antipodean world we will also have to name ‘Australia’.”
Read extra: A classical espionage novel with shades of Le Carre, The Idealist explores the tumultuous path to East Timorese independence
Canon formation and critique
Carter discusses canon formation and canon critique in his chapter on Australian literary historiography, noting “the ascendancy of academic critics above the men and women of letters dominant” earlier than the Nineteen Fifties. That state of affairs pertains right this moment. Few of the contributors are inventive practitioners or academics within the cognate self-discipline of inventive writing.
All of the essays are attention-grabbing. Some are anxious. Some have flashes of heat and appreciation, though “great”, as in Great Australian Novel, is just about an impossibility. Aesthetic judgements are largely resisted.
A system emerges, acquainted to anybody who has peer-assessed journal articles or analysis grant purposes: fly a theoretical or methodological kite initially, ideally with a global tail; discover just a few rigorously chosen case research as the idea for an argument; conclude briskly with a future-directed uptick. The purpose – in key phrases of approbation – is to “expand” or “recentre” the sector.
Carter has argued that Australian literature is as a lot the creation of Australian readers as it’s of Australian writers. Our literature is the totality of the literature we expertise, together with imports and outdoors influences, excessive and low.
It is a strong concept that I first encountered within the essay “Publishing, Patronage and Cultural Politics”, which Carter contributed to The Cambridge History of Australian Literature edited by the late Peter Pierce in 2009. It manifests right here in an curiosity in all points of ebook manufacturing and literary circulation, together with gross sales and accounts.
This historical past is many-faceted and holistic. In a chapter on publishing, Roger Osborne quotes Carter describing the Australian novel as a “commodity, industry, professional or aesthetic practice, ethical or pedagogical technology, leisure, entertainment, policy object and national space”.
This catch-all conception boils right down to a grand definition: the novel in Australia is “a central cultural technology” that “insists on its storytelling power for a wide range of ethical, political and cultural issues, even where written within the bounds of a popular genre form”.
The description recognises the status of the novel, whether or not as bestseller or rarefied prizewinner, whereas implicitly accepting that everybody has a novel in them and anybody can write one.
Read extra: ‘The Red Witch’: how communist author, mental and activist Katharine Susannah Prichard helped form Australia
Katherine Bode contributes to a chapter on how the which means of the Australian novel is modified by the knowledge now accessible within the AustLit database and To be continued: The Australian Newspaper Fiction Database. Her analysis exhibits we want “to look beyond the book” to media such because the periodical press that generated novels in episodic, ephemeral kind to know the grassroots improvement of fiction in Nineteenth-century Australia.
We must look past the cities for literary communities too, as Emily Potter and Brigid Magner argue of their chapter on the “regional novel”: they recognise that “the region as it creatively emerges is a co-production of writer and reader”.
Missing items of the puzzle
Yet one thing like a canon lingers, to guage by the clusters of respectful mentions. After a handful of Nineteenth-century novels, there are Henry Handel Richardson, Christina Stead, Patrick White, Randolph Stow, David Malouf and, hovering above them with practically double the variety of references within the index, the long-time-comer Alexis Wright.
There are omissions, together with a few of the greatest novels and novelists in my view. But that is what occurs. A puzzling digital omission is Helen Garner, who has produced a string of profitable novels in a profession that has been a continuing argument with fiction. Is she anathema to the academy? Or can nobody discover something attention-grabbing to say about Australia’s nice precursor of the autofiction that has swept the world?
At the opposite finish of the time-frame, Henry Lawson seems to be like one other diminished determine, as Paul Eggert recalibrates the “nationalist myth of the 1890s”. There shouldn’t be a lot place for brief fiction on this historical past. Short story writers, from Mena Abdullah to Nam Le, do not seem.
Among my highlights are Philip Mead on mining trilogies, together with The Fortunes of Richard Mahony (1917-29); Nicole Moore’s radical restoration of postwar realism, together with Ralph de Boissière’s Crown Jewel (1956), set in Trinidad; the eye Meg Brayshaw pays to M. Barnard Eldershaw’s Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow (1947); Elizabeth McMahon on Randolph Stow’s To the Islands (1958); Brigid Rooney’s recognizing of the “purple theme” of “the little sarsaparilla vine” that emerges “from the darker undertones” in Patrick White’s The Tree of Man (1955); and Jessica White on Dyschronia (2018) by Jennifer Mills.
Read extra: The case for The Fortunes of Richard Mahony by Henry Handel Richardson
Emmett Stinson does a compare-and-contrast of David Malouf and Gerald Murnane, discovering that “Malouf’s success is in no small part linked to the way in which educational institutions have assigned his works over the years”. And in “The Novel Road to the Global South”, Sascha Morrell takes a scalpel to celebrated works by Peter Carey and Richard Flanagan to diagnose an Australian situation: “a peculiar, backward-looking nostalgia for Australia’s accustomed ‘underdog’ status”.
Elsewhere the problem of “inherent racism” is famous in passing in Australia’s bestselling invasion narrative for Young Adults, John Marsden’s Tomorrow collection (1993-99).
Multilingual writing?
Emily Yu Zong writes in “The Making of the Asian Australian Novel” that the latest translation into English of Wong Shee Ping’s The Poison of Polygamy – a novel serialised in Melbourne’s Chinese Times from 1909 – “has unveiled the earliest Chinese Australian novel and a neglected multilingual lineage of Australian literature”.
The query of translation comes up in dialogue of Legendary Tales of the Australian Aborigines (1930) by Ngarrindjeri man David Unaipon, in Jumana Bayeh’s consideration of diasporic writing in “The Arab Australian Novel”, and in relation to Behrouz Boochani’s hybrid work No Friend however the Mountains, initially written in Farsi.
Otherwise fiction in languages apart from English barely breaks the floor. That limitation occludes Iwaki Kei’s exceptional novel Farewell, My Orange (2013) about African migrants to nation Australia, which has been translated from Japanese by Meredith McKinney. Multilingual writing appears to be one a part of the “future anterior” that we aren’t fairly prepared for.
Literary historical past can take many kinds. I missed probably the most primary of these: biography. While writers are identity-checked the place doable (“Christos Tsiolkas, a second-generation gay Greek Australian man”), few contributors are all in favour of explaining a author’s profession path.
Top marks then to Beth Driscoll and Kim Wilkins, whose chapter on fantasy, crime and romance fiction gives empirical data on how such stars as Kerry Greenwood and Peter Temple did what they did, and names these, together with brokers, editors and publishers, who have been a part of the method. They shout out to the brief story as essential to the networks that underpin the success of Australian fantasy. Fiction can be a type of sociability.
What are novels for? One reply could be that they’re for lecturers to seek out curiosity in and make researchable and teachable. They are a method to an necessary finish: a part of how “contemporary Australian culture is valued and assessed”, within the phrases of Imelda Whelehan and Claire McCarthy in a chapter on display screen variations. David Carter and his crew have completed a terrific job of displaying the way it’s completed.
Author: Nicholas Jose – Professor of English and Creative Writing, University of Adelaide