Igor Sevenard
Download PDF
May 25 2026
IC Photo/Depositphotos
World order is commonly described spatially, as states defends borders, construct spheres of affect, contest maritime zones, safe provide chains, and compete for institutional affect and positions. Yet, typically underappreciated in worldwide relations (IR), worldwide politics are additionally organized temporally as a result of classes corresponding to order, energy, disaster, and technique depend upon assumptions about political time, albeit these assumptions sometimes stay implicit (Hom 2020, 1067; Hutchings 2008, 1113). It is obvious that political actors, whether or not states, multilateral organizations, or people, don’t function within the current regardless of the longer term whereas passively awaiting it; they govern by way of expectations, warnings, deadlines, narratives, expertise, and guarantees of renewal and progress.
This article argues that the longer term just isn’t a impartial horizon in addition to or exterior of worldwide politics, however as an alternative a way by way of which worldwide relations are performed. Future projections form motion by connecting inherited experiences of the previous to anticipated chance of the longer term, and, critically, imagined futures may even coordinate current behaviour beneath the situation of uncertainty in IR (Beckert 2016, 2024; Mische 2009, 69799; Koselleck 2004, 25660). I argue that East Asia is an important website the place international imaginaries, expectations, dangers, hopes, and political struggles alike are observable in the present day. What is at stake finally is which actor has temporal authority or the flexibility to outline which futures rely as legit, fascinating, harmful, or governable.
For easy causes China gives the clearest case as a result of its official and mental narratives pertaining to future vary from nationwide rejuvenation, to international governance, numerous future-facing initiatives, and ambition of technological preponderance (SCIO 2023; Callahan 2013, 18). But the opposite actors within the area Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan likewise point out distinct modes of future-making by way of using strategic narratives and safety adaptation, respective positioning beneath ongoing and intensifying great-power competitors, in addition to unresolved temporalities of sovereignty and political identification (Kang et al. 2025, 7079; Yoshimatsu 2025, 37476, 37881; Cook et al. 2024, 110). East Asian Futures thus represent a plural subject the place regional and international futures are imagined and contested, and the query is how actors in East Asia use the longer term to construction authority within the current. This issues for college students of IR as a result of a world order is outlined not merely by way of establishments, alliances, or coercion, but additionally by way of claims about what kind of future is fascinating and bonafide, which is especially salient as order in East Asia has lengthy been hierarchical and contested (Goh 2013, 20912; Duara 2013, 56; Cook et al. 2025, 24).
Time and International Relations
IR has typically handled time and temporality as a given or implicitly as background. In most work, occasions happen in a chronological sequence with a given causality. For occasion, wars start and finish, or states rise after which decline. But an emergent physique of labor on temporality posits that point influences IR by way of timing actions and temporal assumptions, making worldwide politics attainable within the first place. Narrative emplotment, too, is itself a timing exercise by way of which numerous political occasions turn into topics of IR. Theories of world politics equally depend upon contested assumptions about political time, together with narratives of repetition, progress, decline, disaster, and transformation (Hom 2020, 2, 21; Hutchings 2008, 59). Naturally, the longer term, not like forecasting, is central to the query of temporality in IR. Kosellecks (2004, 25657) classical work distinguishes between areas of expertise and horizons of expectation, explaining why futures are probably highly effective in how they have an effect on politics, as states interpret the current by relating inherited pasts to projected potentialities of what’s to return. Later literature specifies that future projections don’t essentially must be correct, they solely must form how actors suppose, really feel, arrange, or act within the current. Additionally, fictional expectation and tales about unsure futures have been confirmed to coordinate financial and institutional motion (Beckert 2016, 23; Mische 2009, 699701).
These insights have an effect on IR as a result of states typically govern by way of future claims. For instance, army modernization plans work by projecting hazard, improvement methods promise modernization and progress, local weather targets bind current future to future disaster or safety, and narratives of nationwide rejuvenation instrumentalize unreflected historical past right into a mandate for political motion. Such claims outline what needs to be accelerated or should be defended, and what could be sacrificed and given up. Yet, there are additionally points with goal goals since fashionable states typically create penalties with lengthy temporal attain whereas their establishments solely assign duty inside quick political and epistemic horizons. Besides, the capability to aspire, or undertaking imagined futures, is inherently unequally distributed. Some richer and privileged ergo extra highly effective members of the worldwide society can undertaking and institutionalize futures and govern time, however most poorer and marginalized ergo much less highly effective members encounter the longer term as a narrowing subject of potentialities (Adam and Groves 2007, 18184; Appadurai 2013, 18889). The politics of the longer term is subsequently additionally a politics of inequality. Some futures and the states producing them are authoritative; however most others are implausible.
Why East Asian Futures?
East Asia is a revealing website to look at temporality and futures as a result of its fashionable politics have been outlined by overlapping temporal tasks corresponding to imperial regionalism, anti-imperial nationalism, postwar reconstruction, developmental catch-up, socialist- and post-socialist revolution, the US-led safety order, demographic anxiousness, technological modernization, and disputes over sovereignty and territories. These temporal tasks conspicuously coexist and collide at instances. Nonetheless, there’s a distinction between area and regionalization, as areas emerge by way of interdependence and regionalization emerges by way of lively tasks of region-making (Duara 2013, 56). In the previous a long time, East Asia has been made by way of empire, capitalism, migration, conflict, and safety hierarchies. Its quite a few imagined futures are subsequently extremely relational. A Chinese way forward for rejuvenation and shared destiny, a Japanese way forward for an open Indo-Pacific, a Korean way forward for strategic autonomy, and a Taiwanese way forward for democratic self-determination are mutually constitutive and entangled.
Stressing the character of relationality in East Asia, Womack argues that modern world order is greatest understood as multinodal as an alternative of multipolar. He defines multinodality as an uneven matrix of actors during which every is positioned in an internet of relationships the place actions produce wider reverberations and the place managing uncertainty turns into a strategic process for the state (Womack 2024, 24). In that setting, East Asia is a nodal website whose imagined futures are produced by way of industrial manufacturing networks, international requirements, commerce routes, funding flows, alliances, sanctions, and strategic expectations. As a key function of multinodality, rhetoric debates in addition to concrete on the bottom developments surrounding AI requirements or provide chains all reverberate inside East Asia but additionally outward to Europe, Africa, South- and North America, influencing commerce and safety. Future-making in East Asia helps outline regional and international hierarchies, and decide what types of management are legit. Claims to East Asian Futures are thus claims to temporal authority, a robust type of affect touching each side of IR, and permitting a variety of actors with numerous pursuits, be they liberal, autocratic, democratic, civilizational, or technocratic.
China: Rejuvenation and Shared Future
For many, China is the obvious and conspicuous actor aiming to train temporal authority as a result of its future-oriented rhetoric explicitly hyperlinks home legitimacy to world order. The China Dream (zhongguo meng) conceptualizes the nice rejuvenation of the Chinese individuals (Zhonghua minzu weida fuxing) as an imagined future and reply to narratives of historic rejuvenation and lack of modernization, and standing. But the China Dream just isn’t merely a slogan by the Chinese Party-state; reasonably, it’s a discursive subject during which officers, intellectuals, cultural producers, and the overall inhabitants debate Chinas positionality in worldwide politics in addition to its future on this planet (Callahan 2013, 18). The political energy lies within the exact hyperlink between information and energy, as defining Chinas future equals the conception of Chinas present function on this planet. The official idea of a Global Community of Shared Future (renlei mingyun gongtongti, beforehand typically translated as Community with a Shared Future for Mankind) and the 2023 white paper current the idea as Chinas imaginative and prescient and reply to what sort of world needs to be constructed and the way it needs to be constructed. It hyperlinks peace, improvement, safety, civilization, and the ecology into one future-oriented political idea, constituting essentially the most succinct type of self-representation by China up to now (SCIO 2023). The GCSF makes use of futurity to make an express order declare by narrating a future world during which Beijings most popular ideas turn into the core of legit international governance
Additionally, China typically refers to tianxia (All beneath Heaven) as a timeless Chinese different to Western types of order. Traditionally, tianxia has typically been defined as a altering world-scape that’s formed by way of cosmology, hierarchy, ritual, and geography throughout giant durations of Chinese historical past, indicating {that a} Sinocentric world order has been the norm for IR of the previous (Wang 2012, 36970). However, the scholarship has argued that though Chinese intellectuals actively try to mobilize previous traditions to think about different futures, such back-to-the-future narratives stay incomplete for modern understanding of IR if they’re indifferent from fashionable types of capitalism, nationalism, and establishments (Murthy 2022, 13). Chinas future-making is that this neither propaganda nor a coherent blueprint. It is a negotiation over the particular ideas and terminology, one may say the infrastructure of world governance, by way of which sovereignty, hierarchy, and order turn into thinkable. National rejuvenation, shared future, tianxia these all inform totally different temporal tales with China at their centre.
Japan and Korea: Competing Regional Futures
Japan portrays a unique mode of future politics, as it’s partly defensive and partly normative by involving a required adaptation to Chinas rise, the purpose to protect regional order, and narrating Japans personal constraint function. Scholars evaluate Chinese and Japanese diplomatic narratives by treating Chinas GCSF with Japans idea of a FOIP as competing narrative devices, that are tied to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and normative values, respectively. For Japan the FOIP constitutes a 3rd means of improvement between Chinese and US pressures (Yoshimatsu 2025, 373, 378). However, Japans future politics additionally contain an institutional manufacturing of risk and concern (kenen). The growing securitization of China in Japan can not merely be defined away by way of Chinese behaviour; significantly the improve of the Japan Defence Agency into the Japan Ministry of Defence resulted in a harsher safety discourse, and sooner than typical timelines counsel, too (Schulze 2018, 24142). Threat narratives are significantly temporal and consequential in nature, as they establish a creating hazard, undertaking that risks trajectory, and justify adjustments to establishments and behaviours earlier than the scary future totally arrives.
South Korea provides one other dimension of future-making in type of strategic positioning beneath situations of geopolitical uncertainty. Sitting on the intersection of North Korea contingencies, US alliance politics, financial publicity to China, historic reminiscence vis–vis Japan, and home political contestation, South Korea seems significantly on the wims of temporality and imagined futures from a number of vectors and actors. Cook et al. argue that Seoul has been trimming the hedge by eradicating earlier coverage stopgaps that briefly stabilized relations with China (THAAD debacle) and aligning more and more with the US for safety whereas remaining constrained by financial interdependence with China, although this too appears in flux beneath the erratic behaviour of the US beneath the Trump administration (Cook et al. 2024, 13, 10). Notably, that is an ongoing wrestle over the future-oriented statecraft by South Korea; whether or not to protect ambiguity, consolidate alignment, or hold hedging beneath nice energy competitors stays, subsequent to safety, additionally a query of temporality and imagined futures.
Taiwan and the Future of Sovereignty
Taiwan and its future as politics represents a pointy type of temporal improvement as sovereignty stays an unresolved temporal declare. Critically, Taiwan is not only about territory, deterrence, and diplomatic recognition, however touches upon whether or not political time is imagined as a state of unfinished civil conflict, nationwide rejuvenation, democratic self-determination, inherited sovereignty, or everlasting strategic ambiguity. Each type of political time permits a definite current. Within Chinese considering, Taiwan likewise is a non-negotiable problem of sovereignty and nationwide identification, although latest scholarship signifies that Chinas goals are trans-dynastic and never growing in scope, and much much less hegemonic than many Western analysts posit (Kang et al. 2025, 75, 8081). Ultimately, narrating Taiwan as an unresolved query of nationwide identification and territorial unity explains why Taiwan is greater than only a geopolitical flashpoint pertaining to the unsinkable plane provider and significant semiconductors. For Beijing, unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an imagined way forward for historic closure, and for Taipei, its imagined futures deal with democratic self-determination, political autonomy, and the refusal to surrender the status-quo, albeit being threatened by Chinas declare to the island. Hence, the query of temporality turns into: who can turn into the orchestrator of a convincing and profitable and ideally peaceable way forward for a political neighborhood, and the way can this future be bought to the potential members of that neighborhood?
What This Changes for IR
I argue that taking East Asian Futures critically adjustments 4 issues for IR and its college students. First, it shifts analytical consideration from passive prediction to lively manufacturing of future. Which imaginative and prescient of future finally unfolds precisely as claimed Chinas GCSF, Japans FOIP, South Koreas alignment selections, or Taiwans political autonomy is much less related than what these imagined futures have an effect on and allow within the current. The truth of the matter is that these imagined futures justify investments, alliance constructions, institutional change, mobilization of the general public, deterrence, and diplomatic efforts. Second, East Asian think about futures present that world order is made earlier than it’s totally settled. Where IR typically research order by way of establishments, hierarchy, and guidelines, future narratives and imagined futures outline which kind of hierarchies needs to be accepted and which guidelines needs to be defended or revised. Third, analyzing East Asian Futures prevents the area and its affect to be simplified to both simply Chinas rise or the US-China rivalry. Although China is central, different actors corresponding to Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, too, matter by narrating imagined futures of regional order, dangers, threats, and financial publicity, that are developed in relation to one another in addition to to Beijings imaginative and prescient of future. Fourth, East Asian Futures and their particular person in addition to cumulative imagined futures don’t stay native or regional; in a multinodal order safety contingencies, financial coercion, alliance restructuring, and danger calculations reverberate far past the area and affect politics on all continents in addition to the world order at giant. Not to say that East Asia determines what occurs in different areas of the world, however East Asian Futures redistribute uncertainty, alternative, danger, and constraint throughout the multinodal wider net of worldwide relations.
References
Adam, Barbara, and Chris Groves. 2007. Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161771.i-218.
Appadurai, Arjun. 2013. The Future As Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition. Verso.
Beckert, Jens. 2016. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Harvard University Press.
Callahan, William A. 2013. China Dreams: 20 Visions of the Future. Oxford University Press.
Cook, Richard J., Maximilian Ohle, and Zhaoying Han. 2024. South Koreas Foreign Policy Shifts Under President Yoon and Implications for the Sino-US Peer Competition. Korea Observer 55 (1): 128. https://doi.org/10.29152/KOIKS.2024.55.1.1.
Cook, Richard J., Maximilian Ohle, and Zhaoying Han. 2025. Asia Pacific Secondary States as Kingmakers: Alignment Roles within the China-US Strategic Competition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003512165.
Duara, Prasenjit, ed. 2013. Asia Redux: Conceptualizing a Region for Our Times. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Goh, Evelyn. 2013. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford University Press.
Hom, Andrew R. 2020. International Relations and the Problem of Time. Oxford University Press.
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2008. Time and World Politics: Thinking the Present. Manchester University Press.
Kang, David C., Jackie S. H. Wong, and Zenobia T. Chan. 2025. What Does China Want? International Security 50 (1): 4681. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC.a.5.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Columbia University Press.
Mische, Ann. 2009. Projects and Possibilities: Researching Futures in Action. Sociological Forum 24 (3): 694704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01127.x.
Murthy, Viren. 2022. The Politics of Time in China and Japan: Back to the Future. Routledge.
Schulze, Kai. 2018. Japans New Assertiveness: Institutional Change and Japans Securitization of China. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 18 (2): 22147.
SCIO. 2023. Full Text: A Global Community of Shared Future: Chinas Proposals and Actions. State Council Information Office of the Peoples Republic of China, September 1. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202309/26/WS65124140a310d2dce4bb7dce.html.
Wang, Mingming. 2012. All beneath Heaven (Tianxia): Cosmological Perspectives and Political Ontologies in Pre-Modern China. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (1): 33783. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.1.015.
Womack, Brantly. 2024. Strategic Principles for Co-Existence in a Multinodal World. China International Strategy Review, no. 6 (May): 2238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-024-00155-8.
Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. 2025. Examining China and Japans Narratives as Diplomatic Tools: Competitive Nature and International Influence. Journal of Contemporary China 34 (153): 36782. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2024.2352760.
Further Reading on E-International Relations
- Understanding the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute: Diplomatic, Legal, and Strategic Contexts
- Assessing Neutrality: The United States Role within the Diaoyu Islands Dispute
- A Pessimistic Rebuttal: The Eventual Return of Sino-Japanese Tensions
- The Dokdo and Kuril Islands: Japans Twin Disputes
- Chinas Strategic Thinking on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Island Dispute
- Japans Role in Shaping the Security Landscape of Southeast and East Asia
About The Author(s)
Igor Sevenard is presently a PhD candidate on the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, and a member of the Research Training Group 2833, East Asian Futures: Visions and Realizations on National, Transregional, and Global Scales. He holds an M.Sc. in Contemporary Chinese Studies from Oxford University. His analysis pursuits embody Order, Status, and Narrative in International Relations, in addition to Great Power Competition and Chinese Foreign Policy. His work has appeared in Politics, Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, and Asian Review of Political Economy. Additionally, he has contributed to shops corresponding to The Diplomat, E-International Relations, and The Loop ECPR.
Tags
East AsiaImagined FuturesInternational Relations TheoryRegionalizationTemporality