TOKYO, Jan 13 (News On Japan) –
The speedy evolution of synthetic intelligence (AI) is remodeling society and turning into an indispensable a part of each day life. How ought to we interact with AI and be taught to coexist with it? Author Keiichiro Hirano and thinker Akiko Suzuki, an emeritus professor at Kyoto University, exchanged views on this urgent concern.
“I don’t believe it’s technically feasible to create something that surpasses human intelligence so easily,” Hirano mentioned. “Life is often compared to walking in darkness, and navigating this gray area requires a certain level of adaptability.” He expressed his perception that we’re coming into an period that calls for a renewed appreciation for human creativity in creative experiences.
Suzuki, addressing Hirano, remarked, “You’ve explored the concept of AI in your novels, delving into various perspectives. There’s a growing expectation about what AI can achieve, but simultaneously, concerns about AI surpassing human intelligence, dominating society, or taking away jobs are intensifying. In this context, we need to carefully consider how we can live alongside AI.”
Hirano famous the excellence between slim AI and general-purpose AI as the inspiration of ongoing discussions. “Narrow AI operates as a tool under human control, while the feasibility of general-purpose AI remains questionable,” he mentioned. “I am skeptical about the singularity hypothesis because our understanding of human existence is incomplete. Therefore, I doubt the possibility of easily creating an entity that surpasses human intelligence.”
He added, “Narrow AI excels in specific tasks, and its use in various fields has become increasingly prominent. However, general-purpose AI is fundamentally based on algorithms that aggregate and pattern data. While this allows AI to make impressive predictions in conversations, the responses are often based on generalized learning rather than genuine understanding of unsaid emotions.”
Hirano drew upon his novel, which facilities on a younger man recreating his deceased mom utilizing AI. He defined, “In the story, the protagonist struggles to overcome his loss and seeks his mother’s true feelings through interactions with her AI-based representation. The novel raises questions about whether life logs collected through digital means can provide insights into a person’s genuine thoughts.”
Suzuki highlighted considerations over how AI may alter human communication. “The advancement of AI, particularly in areas like human resource evaluation, raises ethical concerns,” she mentioned. “If AI is used to avoid difficult conversations between superiors and subordinates, it could undermine genuine communication. We must develop a framework to ensure AI complements rather than replaces human interaction.”
Both agreed that whereas AI-driven journalism is advancing, human journalists stay important for gathering main info and deciphering complicated contexts. Hirano concluded, “AI will continue to evolve and influence various fields, but it cannot replace the value of human creativity. Readers still desire works created by real authors because of their personal experiences and emotional depth.”
Suzuki steered that society may profit from “digital detox” intervals. “If we periodically disconnect from digital devices, it could sharpen our senses and enhance interpersonal communication,” she mentioned. “This approach may help us better navigate the challenges of AI-driven life.”
The dialogue underscored the necessity for moral AI governance and the function of human creativity in an more and more AI-driven world. Both Hirano and Suzuki emphasised the significance of sustaining a balanced perspective on AI’s potential and limitations.
Source: Kyodo