In final July’s House of Councilors election, the Supreme Court’s Grand Bench dominated that the so-called 1-vote disparity was as much as 3.03 instances, and that it was “constitutional” and didn’t violate the Constitution.
In the rulings of the excessive courts in varied areas, there have been 1 case of “violation of the structure,” 8 instances of “unconstitutionality,” and seven instances of “constitutionality.”
Last 12 months’s House of Councilors election was thought of “constitutional” – Supreme Court case over disparity in a single vote | NHK
