Regarding the executive doc of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications in regards to the interpretation of “political equity” stipulated by the Broadcasting Law, the Constitutional Democratic Party identified that “the doc reveals that the interpretation that state energy can intervene in broadcasting has been created.” In response, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications repeatedly defined that it didn’t change the interpretation of the Broadcast Law.
In response to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications’ publication of an administrative doc on the interpretation of “political fairness” stipulated by the Broadcasting Law, the Constitutional Democratic Party held a listening to from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications within the Diet.
Among them, Mr. Hiroyuki Konishi of the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan stated, “It is a document that shows that the terrible interpretation that the state power can intervene in broadcasting at any time was created through an unfair process.” It was then-Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications Takaichi who stated, “If Prime Minister Abe gives the go-ahead, I will do it.”
In response to this, the particular person in command of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications defined that responding to Mr. Isozaki’s inquiry was a part of his work and that there was no drawback, and that he had not modified the interpretation of the Broadcast Law. backside.
He additionally defined that it was unclear who created the memo, which is alleged to be the results of a phone dialog between Minister Takaichi and former Prime Minister Abe, and additional scrutiny was required.