KyoAni Trial: Prosecution and protection battle over accountability; interim argument/argument | NHK

In the Kyoto Animation arson homicide trial, prosecutors argued of their interlocutory argument that defendant Shinji Aoba was totally accountable, understanding that it was a criminal offense and appearing in a deliberate method. Did. On the opposite hand, the protection legal professional, who maintains his innocence, acknowledged in interlocutory argument that “over 10 years of delusional experiences and anger have precipitated him to lose the flexibility to differentiate between proper and flawed and to regulate his actions.”

Source