“This is ‘60 Minutes,’” Harry Reasoner introduced on Sept. 24, 1968, introducing his new CBS News present alongside fellow correspondent Mike Wallace. “It’s kind of a magazine for television.”
He added: “We do think this is sort of a new approach.”
More than a half-century and 58 seasons later, that very same time period — “new approach” — is being deployed by CBS News chief Bari Weiss to elucidate her sweeping modifications on the most famous news program in TV historical past: firing the highest producer and two correspondents, amongst others, and putting in a brand new chief with no TV broadcast expertise. Now, one of many present’s most well-known faces, Scott Pelley, is gone too — fired after a tense confrontation with bosses.
“We realize, of course, that new approaches are not always instantly accepted,” Reasoner mentioned on that night time in 1968. And Weiss’ “new approach” has been greeted with biting criticism from some corners. Moreover, the turmoil has turn out to be a high news story in itself, with competing narratives flying — none of them flattering to CBS News.
The important query percolating on Wednesday: Where does “60 Minutes” go from right here? Can it cease being the story, get again to work and retain its popularity for probing journalism and its legendary success atop the news meals chain? Or is its well-known ticking timer, as some concern, actually operating out?
To one outstanding analyst of TV news, it appeared Wednesday that one thing had already evaporated — if solely, maybe, a long-held notion that “60 Minutes,” which manages to be each old-school and pugnacious, was one thing basically untouchable.
“My first response is, it started in 1968 — not a bad run,” mentioned Robert Thompson, director of Syracuse University’s Bleier Center for Television and Popular Culture. “Because it actually does appear like that is systematically deconstructing what (the present) was.”
But, he rapidly added: “I don’t think we’re writing the obituary of ‘60 Minutes.’ I think there’s just too much value and voltage built into that brand.”
He felt, although, that there have been regarding indicators. The present is instantly down 4 correspondents. Three have been dismissed, together with Pelley, and Anderson Cooper is leaving of his personal accord. There have additionally been unsettling accusations launched by Pelley. “New management has instructed me to inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story,” the correspondent and former night news anchor contended in a press release Tuesday. “I’ve been told to include assertions that are unverified.”
CBS News denied the cost. “There is no political interference at CBS News, not from ownership, not from Bari Weiss,” said a statement from a spokesperson Wednesday night. “The only ‘interference’ is the normal back and forth between editor and correspondent that happens in every newsroom.”
To Jeff Fager, former government producer of “60 Minutes” and writer of a e-book on the present, a significant deficit would be the lack of Pelley himself.
“I can’t imagine running ‘60 Minutes’ without Scott,” mentioned Fager, writer of “Fifty Years of 60 Minutes: The Inside Story of Television’s Most Influential News Broadcast.”
“His is the most remarkable body of work in the history of the broadcast,” Fager mentioned. “It’s hobbled without him.”
A dizzying week of public airing of soiled laundry continued Wednesday with remarks from Weiss to workers about Pelley’s firing — and Pelley’s response to these remarks. In a transcript seen by The Associated Press, Weiss started a morning editorial name by saying she was “solely taken with working in a newsroom that’s constructed on belief and mutual respect.”
“That basis was damaged on Monday, and regardless of our makes an attempt to interact with Scott Pelley and to discover a method again, sadly we weren’t in a position to take action, and so we needed to half methods,” Weiss said on the call. “We didn’t need that to occur, however that’s the trail that he selected.”
In brief order, Pelley countered along with his personal prolonged description of their assembly. “Bari Weiss knows what she said is not true,” he mentioned in a press release posted by New York Times media reporter Ben Mullin. “In the meeting on Tuesday, in which I was effectively fired, there was no effort to ‘find a way back.’”
Turmoil had been evident at “60 Minutes” for greater than a yr, after President Donald Trump sued the present over its enhancing of a 2024 interview with then-Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. It turned a part of a broader upheaval at CBS News after Weiss was named to the brand new function of editor-in-chief by mother or father firm Paramount late final yr following David Ellison’s arrival because the community’s company chief.
Ellison’s firm, Skydance, merged with CBS mother or father firm Paramount, which later settled the Trump lawsuit for $16 million, angering some at “60 Minutes” — and indirectly leading to the departure last month of popular CBS late-night host Stephen Colbert, who had called the settlement “a big fat bribe.”
Discord on the present burst into public view final Thursday, when Weiss and CBS News President Tom Cibrowski introduced their modifications geared toward “building a show that thrives in the 21st century.”
They put in Nick Bilton, a former expertise columnist and documentarian, as government producer, changing Tanya Simon, a 30-year veteran of the present who’d been within the high job a few yr. Also let go have been correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi, whose section about Trump administration deportees in a Salvadoran jail had been abruptly pulled by Weiss earlier than operating a month later, and Cecilia Vega.
Four days later, a Monday morning workers assembly exploded into acrimony when Pelley confronted Bilton, saying he had little related expertise for the job. When Bilton instructed the assembly that “Bari loves this institution,” Pelley countered, in line with accounts of recordings: “She’s murdering ‘60 Minutes.’ She does not love this place. She was brought in to kill it and she’s doing exactly that.”
That led to Weiss, Bilton and others calling Pelley in for the Tuesday assembly, after which he was fired. Weiss and Bilton didn’t reply interview requests Wednesday.
Reaction, although, pinballed throughout the media trade. “This is David Ellison’s ‘60 Minutes’ now,” CNN media critic Brian Stelter wrote in his publication Wednesday.
So what does the longer term appear like for the present? In her workers name Wednesday, Weiss praised a few of Pelley’s work on current “unforgettable stories” and promised Bilton could be delivering that form of work “in season 59 with the amazing team that’s still there and hopefully from some new people that are going to be joining us.”
There was no phrase on these additions. A a lot bigger query was whether or not the disarray at “60 Minutes” would show, over time, to be extra political in nature — Pelley and others have accused the brand new leaders of attempting to realize favor with the Trump administration — or extra of a generational debate. Weiss and Bilton have offered the modifications as essential to evolve with the instances.
Fager, amongst others, worries about that narrative. The present, he mentioned, has carried out a very good job adapting.
“It hasn’t been running in place — that’s such a misunderstanding of the broadcast,” he mentioned. “We tailored frequently. Every time there’s been a brand new chief, there was important evolution.”
He acknowledged that some change and evolution is at all times needed. But watching the previous week’s “new approach” unfold, he stays involved concerning the present’s general future.
”I fear about it,” he mentioned. “I’ve always thought it’s fragile, and I don’t take it for granted.”
© Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This materials might not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.