Dec 15 : Tesla’s board of administrators has earned greater than $3 billion by stock awards that far exceeded the worth of these given to friends on the largest U.S. know-how corporations on the time they had been paid, in accordance with an evaluation carried out for Reuters by compensation and governance specialist Equilar.
The evaluation discovered CEO Elon Musk’s brother Kimbal has earned almost $1 billion since 2004, based mostly on the appreciated worth of stock choices held or liquidated. Director Ira Ehrenpreis has collected $869 million since 2007. Board chair Robyn Denholm has made $650 million since 2014.
Directors reaped such windfalls regardless that they have not awarded themselves new stock grants since 2020. The board agreed to droop director compensation beginning in 2021 to settle a shareholder lawsuit alleging extreme board-member pay. Between 2018 and 2020, nonetheless, the common Tesla director obtained a complete of about $12 million in cash-and-stock compensation. That was about eight instances as a lot as the common director at Alphabet, the following highest-paid among the many “Magnificent Seven” corporations over the identical interval.
The worth of these authentic awards skyrocketed together with Tesla’s share worth in subsequent years. That’s additionally true of the opposite six corporations within the Magnificent Seven – Nvidia, Alphabet, Meta, Apple, Microsoft and Amazon – which obtained that identify as a result of their hovering shares have been an enormous driver of the long-running bull market.
But Tesla is the one firm amongst that cohort the place the scale of administrators’ authentic stock awards performed such an outsized position within the huge wealth they’ve earned from these part-time jobs, the Equilar evaluation exhibits. Tesla administrators’ common compensation between 2018 and 2024 – together with the 4 years of suspended pay – was nonetheless two-and-a-half instances that of Meta administrators, the following highest-paid over the seven-year interval.
In a press release to Reuters, a Tesla spokesperson mentioned its administrators’ compensation “is not excessive but directly tied to stock performance and shareholder value creation.” The assertion added that board members present extraordinary service to Tesla and commit “substantial time and effort,” for instance by attending 58 full-board or committee conferences in 2024. The spokesperson mentioned that assembly frequency was nicely above business norms.
Tesla’s board additionally paid itself in stock choices as a substitute of shares, a uncommon observe criticized by some corporate-governance specialists as a result of it magnifies administrators’ upside potential with no draw back threat. Tesla administrators have exercised tens or a whole lot of tens of millions of {dollars} in choices so far but in addition proceed to carry equally giant quantities, Equilar discovered.
Stock choices are the best to purchase the corporate’s stock after a specified interval for a preset worth. Option holders face no threat, corporate-governance specialists say, as a result of they don’t seem to be required to purchase the stock if its worth drops beneath the preset worth. If it appreciates, they’ll purchase the shares at a reduction and instantly unload them at a revenue.
Instead, many governance specialists advise boards to pay administrators in shares to align their pursuits with shareholders. When administrators instantly personal shares, relatively than choices to purchase shares, the worth of their holdings drops if their firm’s stock worth falls. Only 5 per cent of the biggest 200 corporations within the S&P 500 by income concern administrators choices, in accordance with the National Association of Corporate Directors.
The Tesla spokesperson mentioned choices create a extra “at-risk” incentive construction for administrators as a result of they solely get compensated if the stock rises. Directors at different corporations who obtain shares nonetheless get some worth, even when share costs fall, “as long as the stock exceeds $0,” the spokesperson mentioned.
Four corporate-governance specialists who reviewed Equilar’s evaluation for Reuters mentioned the Tesla board’s extraordinary compensation undermines administrators’ independence in overseeing Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk.
“Tesla directors are ridiculously overpaid,” mentioned Douglas Chia, an impartial corporate-governance guide at Soundboard Governance LLC. “Are you actually incentivized to do a better job by being paid this much? Probably not.”
Charles Elson, the founding director of the University of Delaware’s corporate-governance institute, acknowledged Tesla’s argument that administrators solely make cash if the corporate’s stock goes up. But Elson and others suggest paying administrators in restricted stock, which features a vesting interval, to raised align their pursuits with shareholders who can each make and lose cash holding shares. Further, he mentioned, choices are often extra profitable for administrators as a result of they “tend to magnify returns dramatically.”
In addition to the shareholder lawsuit, the Tesla board’s compensation additionally got here below fireplace in a Delaware court docket ruling final yr that invalidated the pay bundle the board gave Musk in 2018, which is price $132 billion on the firm’s present stock worth. The decide discovered board members’ extreme compensation and private ties to Musk compromised CEO-pay negotiations. The board has appealed and promised Musk a alternative bundle price at the very least $42 billion if it loses.
The board in September proposed a brand new compensation bundle for Musk that would grant him as a lot as $1 trillion in Tesla stock over the following decade, price about $878 billion after subtracting what Musk should pay for the shares. Each of those packages alone would make Musk by far the highest-paid CEO in historical past – a title he already holds based mostly on his Tesla earnings so far.
DIRECTORS REAP WINDFALLS FROM SOARING STOCKS
Equilar analyzed Magnificent Seven administrators’ cash-and-stock compensation to search out annual averages from 2018 by 2024. Equilar excluded members who left boards throughout any given yr to make sure these included obtained a full yr’s compensation.
Tesla administrators averaged $1.7 million yearly for these years, regardless of having pay suspended for a lot of the interval. Meta was subsequent highest at almost $685,000. Amazon was lowest at about $307,000.
Equilar additionally calculated the lifetime compensation of each present Magnificent Seven director, together with the appreciated worth of all shares or choices held or offered.
Tesla’s whole of greater than $3 billion was paid to only 5 of its eight present nonexecutive members. The different three – Jeffrey Straubel, Jack Hartung and Joe Gebbia – joined the board after it suspended pay. The lawsuit settlement additionally requires the board to hunt shareholder approval for director compensation after 2023, which it hasn’t but executed.Â
All 5 well-compensated Tesla administrators have cashed out choices. James Murdoch has liquidated the bottom quantity, almost $81 million, whereas board chair Denholm has cashed out the best, at about $595 million, or 91 per cent of her whole compensation.
A number of board members at different Magnificent Seven corporations have additionally reaped enormous sums as their corporations’ worth surged, the evaluation discovered. But lifetime-compensation comparisons amongst totally different corporations are sophisticated by their administrators’ various lengths of service and by the truth that board members at some corporations made private purchases of firm stock that Equilar was unable to exclude from their estimated whole compensation.Â
Equilar couldn’t decide what company-stock purchases administrators may need made earlier than 2003 as a result of regulators didn’t require board members to reveal such purchases earlier than that yr.Â
The examination discovered that Nvidia’s administrators collectively held or had offered about $17 billion within the chipmaker’s stock and Google-parent Alphabet administrators held or had offered about $5 billion in firm shares. Those quantities embrace giant numbers of shares the administrators had been paid for his or her board service but in addition might embrace shares they bought with private funds earlier than the 2003 laws took impact.
None of Tesla’s administrators joined earlier than these guidelines utilized, which signifies that all private purchases of its stock by its board members are disclosed publicly.Â
Stock-purchase disclosures examined by Equilar present that two Tesla board members have purchased comparatively small numbers of shares which might be included in Equilar’s estimates of the administrators’ lifetime earnings. Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson purchased Tesla stock that will be price about $6.8 million and almost $2.5 million, respectively, in the event that they nonetheless maintain the shares. For each administrators, that quantities to about 1 per cent of Equilar’s lifetime compensation estimate.
Alphabet, Meta and Apple mentioned a few of their administrators had bought a number of the shares included in Equilar’s evaluation however declined additional touch upon administrators’ compensation. Nvidia, Microsoft and Amazon declined to remark.
‘WHAT MAKES TESLA DIRECTORS SO SPECIAL?’
No different Magnificent Seven agency has confronted authorized challenges much like Tesla over allegedly extreme compensation. The governance specialists Reuters interviewed mentioned stock awards on the different six Big Tech corporations had been consistent with business norms on the time they had been granted.Â
Tesla’s comparatively beneficiant stock-option grants might compromise administrators’ oversight of the corporate and its CEO as a result of it discourages them from highlighting issues for worry of shedding their board seat, the specialists mentioned. They did not have the identical criticism for circumstances like that of Nvidia – the place board members had been initially compensated inside business norms and solely noticed the worth of their stock compensation soar after lengthy tenures presiding over transformational firm progress.
The two Tesla board members on a committee to craft Musk’s newest pay bundle had been Denholm and Wilson-Thompson. Both have mentioned Tesla compensation accounts for the overwhelming majority of their wealth.
Denholm, a former accounting govt who advises Musk from Australia, has referred to as her Tesla compensation “life-changing.” The earnings grew to become the seedbed of her household funding agency in Australia, the place she has invested in startups and in two skilled basketball groups.Â
Denholm has led public-relations campaigns promoting shareholders on Musk’s compensation packages. She repeatedly warned that Musk would possibly depart the corporate – probably driving down its stock – until shareholders permitted his newest record-setting bundle, which they did final month.
Wilson-Thompson, a former human-resources govt, has made $234 million in seven years, Equilar discovered.
Denholm and Wilson-Thompson declined interview requests.
The governance specialists interviewed by Reuters mentioned administrators’ independence is especially compromised when a board seat presents a lot higher-than-standard compensation or represents the biggest supply of a director’s wealth. Both are true for Denholm and Wilson-Thompson.
Chia, of Soundboard Governance, mentioned nothing about Tesla suggests its administrators deserve vastly larger pay than their friends. “It’s the same job as any other public company,” he mentioned. “What makes Tesla directors so special?”Â

