In the so-called “Hakamada Incident,” on the thirteenth, the court docket allowed a retrial, i.e., a redo of the trial, after referring to the suspicion that the investigative company had fabricated proof. A police officer instructed NHK, “I don’t think it’s a fabrication, but it’s the police and prosecutors’ loss that they couldn’t prove it sufficiently.”
Regarding the choice to start out a retrial of the Hakamada case, authorized and prosecutorial executives have numerous reactions.
One senior prosecutor stated, “I didn’t think I would absolutely win, but I thought my request would not be granted. This case carries a lot of weight because the prosecution sought the death penalty. What do you think about the court’s decision?” We have to significantly and punctiliously think about whether or not we should always cope with it.”
Another government stated, “The court even pointed out the suspicion that the investigative agency fabricated evidence, but I think it’s impossible.”
One government who has expertise in dealing with different retrial circumstances stated, “In retrial cases, it is difficult to judge the relationship of evidence in old cases based on the current judicial sensibilities. We should think carefully about how much influence it will have on the judgment.”
Source