Editor’s word: CGTN’s First Voice offers instantaneous commentary on breaking tales. The column clarifies rising points and higher defines the news agenda, providing a Chinese perspective on the most recent world occasions.
China’s high diplomat Wang Yi mentioned on Monday that for Japan, the urgent activity is to appropriate the inaccurate phrases and deeds of its leaders on the Taiwan query as quickly as doable; that what issues is to undertake an accurate perspective on historic points, and essentially, Japan must develop an goal and rational notion of China.
Wang, director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, made the remarks when assembly with Takeshi Iwaya, President of the Japanese Association for the Promotion of International Trade (JAPIT) in Beijing.
This is a transparent political message. It can also be an inexpensive description of the alternatives going through Japan.
To start with, the Taiwan query issues China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. It lies on the core of the political basis of China-Japan relations.
Japan’s postwar relationship with China was constructed on an understanding of this actuality. The political paperwork signed between the 2 nations established the rules which have guided bilateral ties for many years. They created the premise for diplomatic normalization, financial cooperation and intensive people-to-people exchanges.
In the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, which marked the normalization of diplomatic relations between the 2 nations, Japan explicitly famous that it’s “keenly conscious of” and “deeply reproaches itself” over its duty for battle and that it “recognizes the Government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal Government of China.” The assertion additionally notes that the Government of Japan “fully understands and respects” the place of the Chinese authorities that Taiwan is an inalienable a part of the territory of the PRC.
When Japanese leaders make irresponsible remarks on the Taiwan query, they aren’t merely expressing a private opinion. They are altering the political that means of Japan’s commitments and elevating the danger of confrontation in East Asia. Such statements can encourage miscalculation, making disaster administration tougher when restraint is most wanted.
The pressing activity, subsequently, is to not add one other layer of strategic ambiguity. It is for Japan’s leaders to make clear their place, appropriate their statements and reaffirm the political commitments that made normalization doable within the first place.
Wang Yi, a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee and director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the CPC Central Committee, meets with Takeshi Iwaya, President of the Japanese Association for the Promotion of International Trade (JAPIT), in Beijing, capital of China, September 28, 2026. /Xinhua
For China and different nations within the area, historical past is just not a closed chapter that may be reopened solely on commemorative events. It stays a part of the political and ethical basis of postwar Asia. The struggling brought on by Japanese aggression was not an unlucky by-product of modernization or a misunderstanding amongst neighboring nations. It was the results of militarism and colonial growth.
That is why makes an attempt to attenuate or revise this historical past proceed to impress reputable concern. Visiting controversial battle memorials, defending convicted battle criminals, watering down textbook descriptions or portraying Japan solely as a sufferer of the battle all contribute to historic distortion.
A accountable nation doesn’t lose dignity by acknowledging its previous. On the opposite, real reflection is a supply of political credibility. Japan’s peace structure, democratic establishments and financial cooperation helped it regain belief. Any try to weaken that framework or rehabilitate the ideology that produced wartime disaster could be a retreat, not a revival.
Yet probably the most basic problem is the broader deterioration of Japan’s understanding of China.
In latest years, China has more and more been described in Japan by the language of menace. Economic competitors is framed as coercion. Technological improvement is handled primarily as a safety danger. Normal maritime exercise is interpreted by the lens of confrontation. Cooperation turns into suspect just because it includes China.
This method is strategically shortsighted. China and Japan are shut neighbors with deep financial, cultural and social connections. Their economies stay intertwined, and their populations face shared challenges. According to information launched by the Japan Tourism Agency, vacationers from the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong contributed roughly 30% of complete inbound tourism spending in Japan in the course of the first three quarters of 2025.
Japan’s enterprise neighborhood, native governments, students and civic organizations have lengthy maintained channels of communication with China. The JAPIT, which Wang described as a long-standing power for friendship, represents exactly this custom. Its dedication to returning bilateral relations to the unique function of the 4 political paperwork is necessary at a time when official ties are below pressure.
Next yr will mark the fifty fifth anniversary of the normalization of diplomatic relations between China and Japan. It is a chance to ask whether or not each nations stay devoted to the rules that made normalization doable.
The reply relies upon closely on Japan’s decisions. Correcting harmful statements on Taiwan is the instant requirement. Facing historical past actually is the required political situation. Developing a balanced understanding of China is the long-term basis.
The message from Beijing is finally a name for Japan to choose. The sooner Tokyo corrects course, the higher the prospect that the subsequent anniversary of diplomatic normalization will mark not one other disaster, however a real return to peace, cooperation and mutual respect.
(If you wish to contribute and have particular experience, please contact us at [email protected]. Follow @thouse_opinions on X to find the most recent commentaries within the CGTN Opinion Section.)
Source: CGTN